Politics and the Priest

For a long time I’ve believed that ministers in congregational ministry should encourage engagement with political thought and process as the out-working of the Gospel but should stay clear of publicly dictating which party best fulfils that. I still feel it is not my role to dictate party affiliation but I can no longer keep silent where I feel government policy and praxis is blatantly at odds with the Gospel imperative.

The Kingdom of God is a political entity in the widest sense of that term. It has values that promote inclusion, equality of access, healing for all, challenge to massive wealth inequality, a refusal to label the vulnerable (which is what is meant by ‘judge not lest Ye be judged’). This means that the people who ultimately claim to be Christian have to accept that this is what it means to be a citizen of heaven here on earth. Whilst this is aspirational it is also something we are required through baptism and Eucharist to be committed to fulfilling both individually and corporately, since as Paul says, Christ cannot be divided. The church should work with partners of goodwill to transform society into a place where those values thrive. Not all believe in God as a personal being but many believe in the societal values the Gospel espouses. This may mean encouraging or challenging the state and political animals within it.

Over the past years we have seen the burden of austerity fall upon the least able to bear it whilst any hint of additional taxation upon the wealthiest is met with the usual threat to take money elsewhere – effectively oppressing those who have no such freedom of financial or geographical mobility.

We have seen a land of food banks, praised by the government as an example of The Big Society at work whilst that same government simultaneously decries anyone who asks why they should exist in the first place when the UK can, seemingly, fund a replacement for weapons of mass destruction.

We have seen the failures of health and educational services blamed on practitioners whilst those questioning the underlying issues of lack of financial and human resourcing that create impossible conditions of service are touted as enemies of the free market – branded as being at best misguided, at worst as dangers to civic society.

We have seen those on welfare scapegoated as ‘takers’ whilst corporate and non-domiciled Tax avoiders go largely unchallenged by the government. After all why would you cut off your own tail, one which seems too often to wag the dog?

I could go on but you get the picture. As I see it we increasingly live in a society where the political elite in UK government use the poor and vulnerable to maintain a broken system that continues to benefit the wealthy and privileged. I would like to think that at least for some it is that they simply do not understand. Understanding or not, this cannot go unchallenged. To do so would be to fail in our call to discipleship of The Man for Others.

However, the calling to justice is one that must arise out of following the Christ who leads us into that thing which the Biblical Prophets call Mercy. For them mercy is the active response to a life lived in prayerful connection with God. Mercy flows from God and emerges into this world through our compassion and wisdom, the imperative to ‘love one another as I have loved you’.

In mercy we pray for those charged with exercising governance and leadership, that they in turn may govern in that same spirit of compassion with wisdom. In mercy we raise our voices for the voiceless when the system dominates and fails them. In mercy we challenge those policies we see as running counter to Mary’s cry of ‘lifting up the lowly’. In mercy we refuse to stay silent when we witness oppression. In mercy we challenge those values and attitudes that reduce a human being to an economic unity.

In mercy we are honest with ourselves, lest that thing that Jesus challenged so frequently – hypocrisy – brings a dissonant chord to the sound of our voices.

And in mercy we forgive. We seek to build, not destroy.

I know there will be those in my Church denomination and indeed within some of my own congregations who will disagree with my equating recent policy with a lack of wisdom and compassion. Some may criticise me for not following the expectations of sticking to ‘religion’ (although I maintain that the outpouring of faith and our Christ-like living is based on our response to issues of social justice and the well being of society).

C’est la vie. I can live with that far more easily than being unable to look into the eyes of another victim of unfettered Captalist dogma. Now THAT’S a real religious agenda….